Bringing you live news and features since 2006 

Colin McKie, partner, Maples & Calder

Comment: The Cayman Islands Privy Council decision in the Strategic Turnaround appeal

RELATED TOPICS​

On 13 December 2010, the Privy Council delivered its judgment in the Strategic Turnaround appeal from the Cayman Islands Court of Appeal. Maples and Calder comments on the decision, which clarifies a number of important points in respect of suspensions and redemptions by Cayman Islands investment funds.

The key point from the Privy Council’s decision is that it is the terms of the fund’s articles that determine the rights of all parties in respect of redemption by investors and the suspension of redemptions and payment rights.

Colin McKie (pictured), partner, Litigation Group, Maples and Calder Cayman Islands, welcomes this confirmation of Maples and Calder’s long standing view and adds, "This lays to rest the uncertainties that arose from the Court of Appeal decision that there was any wider principle that an investor always remains a shareholder until paid in full". In addition,
 
Jon Fowler, Head of Investment Funds Group, Maples and Calder Cayman Islands, adds that the decision "confirms that in the absence of a clear and unambiguous term in the articles, a fund cannot suspend payment of redemption proceeds to an investor pursuant to a valid redemption notice after the redemption date has passed".
 
Background to the case: In brief, an investor submitted a redemption request and the NAV was duly struck. Before the investor received the redemption proceeds, the fund purported to suspend redemptions and payment of redemption proceeds.
 
The investor issued a winding up petition against the fund on the basis of cash flow insolvency (i.e. it was unable to pay the debt due under its redemption notice) and on just and equitable grounds. The fund applied to strike out the petition summarily. The Privy Council refused to do so.
 
Therefore, terms contained in the fund’s offering documents will only be relevant if they are clearly incorporated into the articles. In the absence of such a clear wording, the court will give effect to the plain meaning of the articles even if that is inconsistent with what has been stated in the offering documents.
 
The Implications for funds and their advisors are very clear. Care must be taken to draft fund’s articles and offering documents so that they clearly state: (i) the investor’s entitlements on redemption; (ii) the fund’s powers of suspension.

 

Latest News

Morningstar has published a review of the European ETF market for the first quarter 2024, which finds that it gathered..
ETF data consultant ETFGI reports that assets invested in the global ETF industry reached a new record of USD12.71 trillion..
Calastone has published an ETF white paper which examines several of the processes that take place across the lifecycle of..
Adapting product lines to fit into changing methodologies and meet shifting demand is essential to remaining relevant in the industry..

Related Articles

ETFs
US ETF issuers of active ETFs are facing an increase in fees from the big custodian firms, such as Charles...
Taylor Krystkowiak, Themes ETFs
Themes ETFs opened its doors in December 2023, with an introductory suite of 11 ETFs – seven thematic and four...
Konrad Sippel, Solactive
At the end of March, financial index specialist, Solactive, published its 2024 annual report on future trends.  ...
Lorraine Sereyjol-Garros, BNP Paribas
Following changes to the French Monetary and Financial Code and of the French market authority AMF’s General Regulation, it is...
Subscribe to the ETF Express newsletter

Subscribe for access to our weekly newsletter, newsletter archive, updates on the site and exclusive email content.

Marketing by