Bringing you live news and features since 2006 

Key information material for retail investors should not be overburdened, says EUSIPA

RELATED TOPICS​

The European Structured Investment Products Association (EUSIPA) says that in general it welcomes the idea of standardising the legal requirements for the distribution of financial products to retail customers.



 
EUSIPA has responded to the European Commission’s proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on key information documents for investment products, relating to the regulation of packaged retail investment products (PRIPs),
 
EUSIPA says it is convinced that a framework for the proposed key information document (KID) deemed to summarise the features of a product, including its risk profile, is beneficial in terms of market transparency, and also helps to ensure comparability across different financial products.
 
It says many of its national member associations, notably the Deutsche Derivate Verband in Germany, have for several years been engaged in a process of establishing key information material for retail investors. EUSIPA therefore encourages the relevant EU law-making institutions to take account of existing best-practice examples going forward.
 
However, it is concerned that some requirements relating to the content of the KID could make the document overly detailed, which would run counter to the original intended purpose of the material.
 
There is also the possibility of there not being a clear distinction between the KID and other product-related information material. EUSIPA has stressed the importance of harmonising the KID requirements with other disclosure documents already required under different national regimes for retail product distribution in the EU, such as the Italian Scheda Prodotto.
 
EUSIPA is also very concerned that the proposed reversion of the burden of proof in relation to damage claims following the use of the KID document could create a significant incentive for unwarranted litigation by           investors, while also putting an unfair burden on product manufacturers.
 
“As much as we support harmonising the distribution of financial retail products in the EU, we are concerned that the proposed regulation overshoots original intentions. It runs the danger of amassing a large amount of information on what should be a short and clear document. Neither do we support the creation of a potential new market for litigation, which will benefit lawyers but will not benefit customers,” says Thomas Wulf, Brussels-based secretary general of EUSIPA.

Latest News

Raymond James Investment Management plans to launch an ETF product platform in 2025 to support strong client demand in alignment..
Aniket Ullal, Director of ETF Data and Research at CFRA Research, has written a note looking at ETFs with exposure..
Tradeweb reports the following data derived from trading activity on the Tradeweb Markets institutional European- and US-listed ETF platforms...
iShares writes that its assets under management have reached USD4 trillion. The firm says this comes off the back of..

Related Articles

Scott Kefer, VictoryEx Capital Holdings
Bailey McCann writes that active ETFs are capturing investor interest, according to the latest data from Morningstar, which finds that...
Chris Lo, Columbia Threadneedle
In a recent insight on India by Columbia Threadneedle Investments, the firm reports that the country’s economic reforms, which aim...
With an election on the horizon in the United States a group of ETFs is poised to capture investments on...
Robot worker
Qraft Technologies, based in South Korea, specialises in the use of AI in security selection and portfolio construction....
Subscribe to the ETF Express newsletter

Subscribe for access to our weekly newsletter, newsletter archive, updates on the site and exclusive email content.

Marketing by