Bringing you live news and features since 2006 

FCA publishes final guidance on inducements for product providers and advisory firms

RELATED TOPICS​

Financial advisers and product providers share the responsibility of managing potential conflicts of interests when receiving and making payments under service and distribution agreements, according to the FCA.

FCA’s finalised guidance on inducements published this week follows a review that found payments were still being made that could result in advisory firms favouring one product provider over another, undermining the aims of the Retail Distribution Review (RDR).
 
The FCA has been clear that firms have to comply with the spirit of the RDR, which aimed to increase transparency and professional standards in the investment advice industry.
 
Following consultation, the final inducements’ guidance states that payments from product providers to advisory firms should be based on reasonable reimbursement for the costs incurred by advisory firms. Furthermore, any such payments should always enhance the quality of service provided to customers.  The regulator has provided additional examples of good and poor practice, and guiding principles to further help industry.  
 
Clive Adamson, director of supervision at the FCA, says: “The rules on inducements and conflicts of interest are not new. However our review made it clear there were certain practices that did not stand up to scrutiny. In the guidance published today we are helping firms better understand our expectations. Now it is for firms to make sure any payments are legitimate, are in consumers’ interest and that potential conflicts are well managed.”
 
The original review was published in September and found a number of practices that gave cause for concern. They included:
 
• Some payments by product providers to advisory firms appeared to be linked to securing sales of their products.
 
• Financial arrangements in place with product providers that potentially incentivised advisory firms to promote a specific provider’s product to their advisers.
 
• Further, the FCA also identified that certain joint ventures, where a new investment proposition is jointly designed by providers and advisory firms, could create conflicts of interest and potentially lead to biased advice.
 
The FCA has published its finalised guidance together with a summary of the feedback received to the guidance consultation, to help firms better understand its expectations.  The FCA expects firms to review, and, if necessary, revise their existing agreements in light of the finalised guidance, and to do so within three months of its publication.

Latest News

Saving and investing app, Moneybox, has doubled the number of ETFs available on the platform, in the light of ‘growing..
Global X ETFs has announced the appointment of Ryan O'Connor as its Chief Executive Officer effective as of April 8, 2024. ..
Value-driven structured credit investing firm, Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC, has announced the completed conversions of two of its mutual..
Confidence in the continuing strength of bitcoin and Ethereum is driving wider interest in altcoins and other digital assets, according..

Related Articles

Jeremy Senderowicz, Vedder Price
Jeremy Senderowicz, a member of the Investment Services Group at law firm Vedder Price, has witnessed a steady upswing in...
Graham MacKenzie, Toronto Stock Exchange
The evolution of ETFs has been a multi-decade experience for Toronto Stock Exchange says Graham MacKenzie, managing director, Exchange Traded...
Frank Koudelka, State Street Global Services
ETF data provider and ETF Express data partner, Trackinsight, has published its Global ETF Survey 2024 Report: ‘50+ Charts on...
Cryptocurrencies
Matteo Greco, Research Analyst at Fineqia International writes that bitcoin (BTC) ended the week at approximately USD52,150, showing a notable...
Subscribe to the ETF Express newsletter

Subscribe for access to our weekly newsletter, newsletter archive, updates on the site and exclusive email content.

Marketing by