Bringing you live news and features since 2006 

HMRC proposals for tackling offshore tax evasion are seriously flawed, says Kingsley Napley


The proposed new HMRC powers to "crack down" on offshore tax evasion are seriously flawed, law firm Kingsley Napley says in its official response to the HRMC consultation exercise.

Specifically, the plan to introduce a new strict liability offence for individuals who evade tax is unclear, unworkable and ultimately unjust, Kingsley Napley says.
Kingsley Napley partner David Sleight (pictured), who specialises in defending both companies and individuals facing investigation and action by HMRC, says: "It is disappointing that HMRC has not taken previous strong opposition to this measure on board. Tax evasion by definition requires a deliberate act to deprive the Revenue of monies to which it is entitled. There must therefore logically be a specific intent to evade tax for the offence to be made out. As such, the basis of any prosecution should require proof of fraudulent or dishonest behaviour. The problem with what is proposed is that someone could be found guilty of committing tax fraud following a genuine mistake.
"No examples have been given of the kind of behaviour which would be caught by the proposals that are not already covered by offences under current tax evasion provisions. The proposed legislation is complex, confusing and is likely to create more litigation than it resolves. The lack of clarity rather defeats the purpose of the proposed legislation which was apparently designed to be simpler to administer.”
Whilst Kingsley Napley recognises HMRC is aware of the inherent unfairness of a strict liability offence and has thus proposed a number of defences including “reasonable excuse” and “reasonable care” for not providing accurate information regarding offshore income or assets, it feels these are currently ill-defined.
"It is not clear to us whether guidance will be issued or whether HMRC will simply wait for the Courts to decide," David Sleight adds. "It is our view that it would have been more appropriate to focus resources on effective enforcement under the civil regime and existing criminal measures rather than create a new offence with a series of caveats and defences."
In conclusion Kingsley Napley's submission says: "We understand HMRC’s policy objective in pursuing tax evaders and the political and media pressure currently being played out during party conference season. However, the proposals as they stand are unclear, unworkable and ultimately unjust.  To impose what would essentially be a reverse burden of proof in circumstances where an individual would be facing a potential custodial sentence cannot be reasonable.  Resources should not be spent on developing a new system that is inherently unfair and which defeats its very purpose."

Latest News

BlackRock writes that May marked the highest inflow month of the year for both rates and high yield (HY) ETPs,..
SIX reported a combined 12.3 per cent trading turnover increase in CHF for its two exchanges in Switzerland and Spain..
EFAMA’s March figures reveal that UCITS and AIFs recorded net inflows of EUR24 billion, up from EUR21 billion in February...
VanEck has announced that the VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF has reached over USD2 billion in assets under management (AUM) after..

Related Articles

Stuart Chaussee
In January this year, global data and business intelligence platform, Statista reported that there are now more than 8000 ETFs...
Ethereum coin
Last week saw Australia launch spot bitcoin ETFs, with Matteo Greco, Research Analyst at Fineqia International, writing that Monochrome Asset...
Timothy Rotolo, Range Funds
In 2023, Timothy Rotolo launched his business, Range Fund Holdings, the parent company for Range Indices and Range ETFs, followed...
Dan Miller, IQ-EQ
With just over a week to go till T+1 settlement begins in North America, Canada and Mexico, time is of...
Subscribe to the ETF Express newsletter

Subscribe for access to our weekly newsletter, newsletter archive, updates on the site and exclusive email content.

Marketing by