Bringing you live news and features since 2006 

Bringing you news, views and analysis since 2013
Incorporating Wealth Adviser from 2023

Fitz Partners reveals 23 per cent of retail assets may still pay trail commissions

RELATED TOPICS​

Some 23 per cent of retail assets invested in UK funds are still held in pre-RDR share classes that might pay trail commissions to financial advisers is the chief finding of latest research from Fitz Partners.

Their study is based on their ‘UK Fund Charges’ database and also reveals that in comparison, the percentage of these retail assets in 2013 was over 70 per cent and has been steadily declining over the years.
 

Since 2013, the legacy retail share classes and the so-called clean classes OCF (Ongoing Charge Figure) have followed a similar downward trend over the last six years.  According to Fitz Partners fee data, the average OCF of legacy retail classes for Equity funds has dropped by 8.8 per cent when OCF for Clean classes and Clean-Wholesale classes intended for the largest distribution platforms have come down by 10.1 per cent and 9.8 per cent respectively.  The difference between the legacy retail share classes and clean share classes OCF (Ongoing Charge Figure) currently stands on average at 59 basis points (across all asset classes).
 
Hugues Gillibert, Fitz Partners CEO says: “The proportion of retail investors’ assets in UK funds invested in fully loaded share classes remains high at 23 per cent. The FCA’s ruling facilitating the transfer of investors to clean share classes 18 months ago has had some effect but maybe not as much as expected since it would not allow an easy switch of some retail investors who would have invested sometimes decades ago through an advisor, still being paid trail commission, and to whom they are still legally tied to. We expect to see a further decline in assets invested in legacy retail classes in the coming months as our clients are monitoring these share classes as part of their assessment of value”.
 
“The level of fees for retail classes have come down since the introduction of Clean classes seven years ago but the difference between the retail fees before any potential rebates and the corresponding clean class’ stands at 59bps. This 59bps difference remains larger than the platform fees that would have to be paid directly by investors when switching to Clean classes”.

Latest News

In August 2026, combined trading turnover for SIX Swiss Exchange and BME Exchange was up 19.5 per cent in comparison..
State Street Investment Management writes that investors continued to pour into ETFs in August despite persistent macro uncertainty and the..
CME Group has announced plans to expand its equity product suite with the launch of E-mini Equity Factor futures on..
FTSE Russell and 21shares have announced a comprehensive global partnership to evolve and standardise the underlying benchmark index framework for..

Related Articles

By embedding investing in the same ecosystem its 75 million-plus customers use to spend, save, travel and manage money, Revolut...
Martins Sulte, Mintos
While it’s clear that digital platforms and savings plans have and will continue to drive ETF growth, it would be...
A monthly column on the global crypto markets and ETF/ETP flows, brought to you by CoinDesk Indices, Trackinsight and ETF...
Claire Smith, Beyond Investing
Focus on climate change and avoidance of companies which are involved in the slaughter of, cruelty towards or other mistreatment...
Subscribe to the ETF Express newsletter

Subscribe for access to our weekly newsletter, newsletter archive, updates on the site and exclusive email content.

Marketing by